Connect with us


SAD! Nigerian mum lets her 2 week-old baby die after she refused blood transfusion because of her religious believe



A Nigerian mother has allowed her 2 week-old baby die after she refused to let the anaemic baby get blood transfusion.

According to the mother, ”God said we shouldn’t take blood”.

Nigerian doctor and Twitter user Chioma shared the sad story on her timeline, says it happened at her hospital.

“Madam your baby needs to undergo an urgent surgery and he’ll need blood transfusion too. He’s anaemic.”

Mum moves over to baby’s bed

“Nwam, ngwanu, you will die na. God said we shouldn’t take blood.”

We begged. They refused. He was 2 wks old. I cried. Why?

Faith or Murder?

Would you call this Faith or Murder?

Some religions refuse blood transfusion because they believe that the Bible prohibits ingesting blood and that Christians should not accept blood transfusions or donate or store their own blood for transfusion.

The belief is based on an interpretation of various biblical texts, including Genesis 9:4, Leviticus 17:10, and Acts 15:28,29.

Jehovah’s Witnesses believe that:

Blood represents life and is sacred to God.
After it has been removed from a creature, the only use of blood that God has authorized is for the atonement of sins.
When a Christian abstains from blood, they are in effect expressing faith that only the shed blood of Jesus Christ can truly redeem them and save their life.
Blood must not be eaten or transfused, even in the case of a medical emergency.
Blood leaving the body of a human or animal must be disposed of.
Certain medical procedures involving blood fractions or that use a patient’s own blood during the course of a medical procedure, such as hemodilution or cell salvage, are a matter of personal choice, according to what a person’s conscience permits.
A baptized Witness who unrepentantly accepts a blood transfusion is deemed to have disassociated himself from the group by abandoning its doctrines and is subsequently subject to organized shunning by other members.

The doctrine was introduced in 1945, and has undergone some changes since then. Members of the group who voluntarily accept a transfusion and are not deemed repentant are regarded as having disassociated themselves from the group by abandoning its doctrines and are subsequently shunned by members of the organization.

Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *